When my hour was finished and I in liberty to leave that horrible corner, I pushed out of the crowd and walked down the boulevard, my hat covering my sin, and went quickly. To be in love with my mystery, I thought, that was a strange happiness! It was enough. It was romance! To hear a voice which speaks two sentences of pity and silver is to have a chime of bells in the heart. But to have a shaven head is to be a monk¹! And to have a shaven head with a sign painted upon it is to be a pariah². Alas³! I was a person whom the Parisians laughed at, not with!  
Now that at last my martyrdom was concluded, I had some shuddering⁴, as when one places in his mouth a morsel⁵ of unexpected flavour. I wondered where I had found the courage to bear it, and how I had resisted hurling⁶ myself into the river, though, as is known, that is no longer safe, for most of those who attempt it are at once rescued, arrested, fined, and imprisoned⁷ for throwing bodies into the Seine, which is forbidden.
 
At the theatre the frightful⁸ badge was removed from my head-top and I was given three hundred francs, the price of my shame, refusing an offer to repeat the performance during the following week. To imagine such a thing made me a choking in my throat, and I left the bureau in some sickness. This increased so much (as I approached the Madeleine, where I wished to mount an omnibus) that I entered a restaurant and drank a small glass of cognac. Then I called for writing-papers and wrote to the good Mother Superior and my dear little nieces at their convent. I enclosed two hundred and fifty francs, which sum I had fallen behind in my payments for their education and sustenance⁹, and I felt a moment’s happiness that at least for a while I need not fear that my poor brother’s orphans¹⁰ might become objects of charity—a fear which, accompanied by my own hunger, had led me to become the joke of the boulevards.
 
Feeling rich with my remaining fifty francs, I ordered the waiter to bring me a goulasch and a carafe¹¹ of blond beer, after the consummation of which I spent an hour in the reading of a newspaper. Can it be credited that the journal of my perusement was the one which may be called the North-American paper of the aristocracies of Europe? Also, it contains some names of the people of the United States at the hotels and elsewhere.
 
How eagerly I scanned those singular columns! Shall I confess to what purpose? I read the long lists of uncontinental names over and over, but I lingered not at all upon those like “Muriel,” “Hermione,” “Violet,” and “Sibyl,” nor over “Balthurst,” “Skeffington-Sligo,” and “Covering-Legge”; no, my search was for the Sadies and Mamies, the Thompsons, Van Dusens, and Bradys. In that lies my preposterous¹² secret.
 
You will see to what infatuation those words of pity, that sense of a beautiful presence, had led me. To fall in love must one behold¹³ a face? Yes; at thirty. At twenty, when one is something of a poet—No: it is sufficient to see a grey pongee skirt! At fifty, when one is a philosopher—No: it is enough to perceive a soul! I had done both; I had seen the skirt; I had perceived the soul! Therefore, while hungry, I neglected my goulasch to read these lists of names of the United States again and again, only that I might have the thought that one of them—though I knew not which—might be this lady’s, and that in so infinitesimal a degree I had been near her again. Will it be estimated extreme imbecility in me when I ventured the additional confession¹⁴ that I felt a great warmth and tenderness toward the possessors of all these names, as being, if not herself, at least her compatriots?
 
I am now brought to the admission that before to-day I had experienced some prejudices against the inhabitants of the North-American republic, though not on account of great experience of my own. A year previously¹⁵ I had made a disastrous¹⁶ excursion to Monte Carlo in the company of a young gentleman of London who had been for several weeks in New York and Washington and Boston, and appeared to know very much of the country. He was never anything but tired in speaking of it, and told me a great amount. He said many times that in the hotels there was never a concierge¹⁷ or portier to give you information where to discover the best vaudeville¹⁸; there was no concierge at all! In New York itself, my friend told me, a facchino, or species of porter, or some such good-for-nothing, had said to him, including a slap on the shoulder, “Well, brother, did you receive your delayed luggage correctly?” (In this instance my studies of the North-American idiom lead me to believe that my friend was intentionally¹⁹ truthful²⁰ in regard to the principalities, but mistaken in his observation of detail.) He declared the recent willingness of the English to take some interest in the United-Statesians to be a mistake; for their were noisy, without real confidence in themselves; they were restless and merely imitative instead of inventive. He told me that he was not exceptional; all Englishmen had thought similarly for fifty or sixty years; therefore, naturally, his opinion carried great weight with me. And myself, to my astonishment²¹, I had often seen parties of these republicans become all ears and whispers when somebody called a prince or a countess passed by. Their reverence²² for age itself, in anything but a horse, had often surprised me by its artlessness, and of all strange things in the world, I have heard them admire old customs and old families. It was strange to me to listen, when I had believed that their land was the only one where happily no person need worry to remember who had been his great-grandfather.
 
The greatest of my own had not saved me from the decoration of the past week, yet he was as much mine as he was Antonio Caravacioli’s; and Antonio, though impoverished²³, had his motor-car and dined well, since I happened to see, in my perusal²⁴ of the journal, that he had been to dinner the evening before at the English Embassy with a great company. “Bravo, Antonio! Find a rich foreign wife if you can, since you cannot do well for yourself at home!” And I could say so honestly, without spite, for all his hatred²⁵ of me,—because, until I had paid my addition, I was still the possessor of fifty francs!
 
Fifty francs will continue life in the body of a judicial²⁶ person a long time in Paris, and combining that knowledge and the good goulasch, I sought diligently²⁷ for “Mamies” and “Sadies” with a revived spirit. I found neither of those adorable names—in fact, only two such diminutives²⁸, which are more charming than our Italian ones: A Miss Jeanie Archibald Zip and a Miss Fannie Sooter. None of the names was harmonious²⁹ with the grey pongee—in truth, most of them were no prettier (however less processional) than royal names. I could not please myself that I had come closer to the rare lady; I must be contented³⁰ that the same sky covered us both, that the noise of the same city rang in her ears as mine.
 
Yet that was a satisfaction, and to know that it was true gave me mysterious breathlessness and made me hear fragments of old songs during my walk that night. I walked very far, under the trees of the Bois, where I stopped for a few moments to smoke a cigarette at one of the tables outside, at Armenonville.
 
None of the laughing women there could be the lady I sought; and as my refusing to command anything caused the waiter uneasiness, in spite of my prosperous appearance, I remained but a few moments, then trudged³¹ on, all the long way to the Cafe’ de Madrid, where also she was not.
 
How did I assure myself of this since I had not seen her face? I cannot tell you. Perhaps I should not have known her; but that night I was sure that I should.
 
Yes, as sure of that as I was sure that she was beautiful!